WEBVTT


NOTE Transcript 2024-04-11 from FLAC by https://elvery.net/prototypes/transcribe/ on my MacBook Air M1 on maximum quality setting.
NOTE Body edited.


00:00.000 --> 00:02.000
Diarycast


00:02.000 --> 00:16.800
Hi, I'm Damon Hart-Davis, and welcome to Earth Notes podcast on all things eco and green and efficient at home!


00:16.800 --> 00:19.760
28th of August 2021.


00:19.760 --> 00:28.120
It's dire: a lament to all those out there who think it's up to everyone else but them to help fix climate change,


00:28.720 --> 00:31.640
driven by three separate communications today...


00:31.640 --> 00:34.640
(So this is a dire-y-cast


00:34.640 --> 00:41.200
rather than a diarycast, but if a pun isn't the lowest form of heat, where are we?)


00:41.200 --> 00:45.400
I came back from a few days away from home to (amongst other things)


00:45.400 --> 00:52.560
two emails from friends on green blocking obstinacy and a piece in New Scientist with the quote:


00:53.440 --> 01:00.880
<v NewScientist>Natural England's research reveals that despite widespread concern about biodiversity loss and environmental degradation,


01:00.880 --> 01:06.000
<v NewScientist>the proportion of people willing to accept changes to their lifestyle to protect the environment is low -


01:06.000 --> 01:11.360
<v NewScientist>just one in six - and has hardly budged in the decade the agency has been asking the question.


01:11.360 --> 01:18.560
One of the personal emails I caught up on this morning sent by a trader friend from the City and before, noted (lightly edited):


01:19.120 --> 01:25.760
<v trader>We have a [famous financial institution] trader chat that has been going since before the US election last year.


01:25.760 --> 01:30.240
<v trader>I did pose the question - "Would you be willing to stop flying to help climate change?"


01:30.240 --> 01:36.000
<v trader>Given the prolific amount of flying nearly all these guys do (not just themselves - whole families as well)


01:36.000 --> 01:38.160
<v trader>there were no volunteers.


01:38.160 --> 01:45.600
<v trader>Apart from me! - who said - "if Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos are willing to give up their portfolio of 15 seater private jets and annual


01:46.300 --> 01:51.120
<v trader>100,000 to 200,000 air miles. I would be willing to follow and not fly at all."


01:51.120 --> 01:58.240
It's difficult to know what the really frequent flyers (a few percent of flyers responsible for a huge chunk of the emissions)
are getting from it other than willy waving, ie status.


02:02.080 --> 02:07.680
The other email that struck home was from a friend nearby who has been frustrated


02:07.680 --> 02:14.320
trying to improve the energy efficiency of his home in a borough that has acknowledged the climate change emergency.


02:14.560 --> 02:21.040
He said:
<v neighbour>[the] more general point is that there is no clear and easy route for people to gain permission to insulate their homes


02:21.040 --> 02:25.040
<v neighbour>Feels like a significant blocker to people doing what needs to be done.


02:25.040 --> 02:29.200
This sort of improvement being done sensitively to the look of the property,


02:29.200 --> 02:36.560
should be like pushing on an open door, not wading through treacle.
In a note to a (helpful) councillor he said (again, edited):


02:36.560 --> 02:42.960
<v neighbour>... I've been trying to get permission for many months now to fit external wall insulation to the side and rear of our house.


02:43.120 --> 02:47.280
<v neighbour>Coupled with a number of other improvements (including internal wall insulation at the front),


02:47.280 --> 02:52.960
<v neighbour>this would allow us to significantly improve the efficiency of our house and allow us to stop using fossil fuels.


02:52.960 --> 02:59.280
<v neighbour>Although expensive, seems like the right thing to do.
<v neighbour>The process to gain permission has been very unclear


02:59.280 --> 03:03.440
<v neighbour>and my application was twice returned to me on technicalities.  After several months


03:03.440 --> 03:08.800
<v neighbour>it has been rejected because the appearance of the house will change.  The front view from the street will be unchanged,


03:09.040 --> 03:14.240
<v neighbour>but the side and rear will change from brick to painted render.  Many houses on the street are already rendered,


03:14.240 --> 03:18.960
<v neighbour>so I fail to understand the decision.  Fitting a fake brick finish is an option,


03:18.960 --> 03:24.560
<v neighbour>but it is expensive, has a higher embedded carbon, and in my view would look worse than render -


03:24.560 --> 03:29.920
<v neighbour>you can tell it is fake.
<v neighbour>Part of the problem is that it has not being possible to talk to anyone in the planning office.
<v neighbour>Everything is by correspondence and replies from them tend to follow what appears to be a pre-defined format, never really answering my questions. 

03:37.120 --> 03:42.640
<v neighbour>It's extremely frustrating.
<v neighbour>Climate scientists are saying that we need to stop using gas very soon,


03:42.640 --> 03:44.960
<v neighbour>which requires us to insulate our homes properly.


03:44.960 --> 03:49.840
<v neighbour>It seems clear to me that we need councils to put in place a simple and cheap process to allow this to happen


03:49.840 --> 03:52.960
<v neighbour>that only rejects applications for very good reasons.


03:52.960 --> 03:58.960
<v neighbour>My experience with the planning office leaves me feeling that we have little hope.
<v neighbour>Any help you could provide would be hugely welcomed.


03:58.960 --> 04:01.920
<v neighbour>My application is pretty insignificant in the scheme of things,


04:02.000 --> 04:08.320
<v neighbour>but if it is this difficult for everyone, I can't see any significant improvements being made.
When someone is willing,


04:08.320 --> 04:13.840
careful, and has the money, and is one of the one in six showing some altruism,


04:13.840 --> 04:19.940
why are we getting in their way?
There's more on my Earth Notes Web site at Earth.Org.UK.

